Team Name: DCLD
Team Members: Laleh, Daniel, Chinatsu and David
Wiki Page:
Clarity of the oral presentation
The presentation was the same as every other
presentation as it was not engaging as everyone ready from their piece of paper
or straight from the screen. It was the same problem as I was being fed
information I could go read straight from another website and it was not being
told anything from their perspective.
Clarity of the written presentation
The slides in their presentation were full on
in some sections but well done in others where there were many lists. I felt
with the lists they were able to provide dot points where I was not lost in a
whole lot of text and was able to understand the key points.
Distinctiveness and specificity of the examples:
The examples given linked to real world examples and they provided a
list of how conflict has been evident in their project. They provided clear
examples but it would have been better if they provided more examples.
Referencing
They provided referencing at the bottom of their slides but I was unable
to realise what they were referencing. It has been a common problem throughout
all the presentations.
The conceptual context
The group seem to be on a clear path for their
project. They have encountered many different types of conflict and I feel they
have learnt a lot from this presentation.
The still images:
Some of the images provided were very relevant to their project but
unfortunately the others were like images you could find in clipart.
No comments:
Post a Comment